The true title should be: “A new open source screening tool to help detect autism”

Many of the existing tools to identify autism cost money or are not specific for ASD, and they are hidden behind paywalls and are hard to obtain. A group of scientists led by Tom Frazer at John Caroll University put together a 39 questionnaire called the Autism Symptoms Dimensions Questionnaire to be filled out by parents of children. It’s free and open source! But that’s just the first step. The media got the intent wrong, yet again.

It should not replace a full diagnosis. Autism is complex, and even those with genetic forms of autism show heterogeneity in symptoms. They each need comprehensive evaluations. But this is a good start. Check it out here!!! It’s open source:

References below:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36670671/

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dmcn.15497

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36639821/

Is It Too Good To Be True?

There are small signs that an exciting finding may actually be “too good to be true”.  Are the differences so big it seems impossible to believe?  Is it hard to replicate?  In a new paper, Dr. Thomas Frazier and colleagues outline what these warning signs are are, and how scientists should critically read scientific findings that might be overreaching.  This week, Dr. Frazier answers some questions about what these flags are, and how families can think critically about scientific findings.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31618104